Austria has officially begun enforcing a new law banning hijab in public and private schools for girls under the age of 14 as the academic year got under way on Monday, sparking political divisions and imminent legal challenges over religious freedoms.

The restriction targets head coverings traditionally worn by Muslims, including the hijab. The Austrian government alleged that the policy aims at “protecting” girls and promoting ‘gender equality’.

The legislation was proposed by Austria’s ruling coalition—comprising the conservative Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP), the Social Democrats (SPÖ), and the liberal NEOS party—and passed parliament in December with support from the far-right Freedom Party (FPÖ).

      • orc girly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        If I trusted that they actually have children’s interest at heart I’d give them the benefit of the doubt, but as I see it this is just one tiny step into dehumanizing Muslims and normalizing forcefully removing the hijab from society, which they have already done in many contexts (ex: some medical institutions don’t let you become a doctor if you wear a hijab, you can’t be a judge while wearing it, etc).

      • TheoryofChange [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Basically what they’re worried about is kids being forced to wear hijabs

        This argument is illogical. Children of all ethnicities and religions are routinely forced to wear certain clothes or not wear others by their parents. Banning specific articles of clothing does nothing to change that.

        Also, if children being forced to dress a specific way is a problem, than how is the Austrian state forcing children to dress a specific way acceptable as a “solution”

        Arguments in favor of a hijab ban only make sense if you think hijabs are somehow uniquely harmful, a nonsensical and racist premise in my view.

  • manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Will they next ban all clothing for prepubsecent children? Their parents make them wear clothes, its oppression!

  • YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    You can only get more and more naked and sell your body in the West, going in the opposite direction is in opposition to Western values. 🤷‍♂️

  • Melobol@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    There was something similar in the US about Quaker clothing being prosecuted. In the 1600s - but they built up enough community to be strong enough to protect themselves.

    I don’t not like the powers to tell anyone how to dress.

    The problem that those powers include their fathers and brothers and their religion also.
    Such a sticky situation that doesn’t have any real solution.

  • Sibshops@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Feels just as bad as Muslim countries with a mandatory hijab. The problem is when women feel pressured to do one thing or another.