• plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
        07·
        10 days ago

        No, I seriously don’t see how that comment could be considered incriminating. That would mean that no adult could ever talk to kids. Which shouldn’t need to be explained just how stupid that is.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          3·
          10 days ago

          Mentioning seeing a “hot little girl” who is also a “kid” isn’t incriminating? Maybe there’s nothing immediately legally-actionable about it, but Wheel of Fortune was absolutely right to give him the ol’ heave-ho over it. Best case (for them), it’s the grossest sentence ever written. Worst case, there’s about to be an investigation that will land him in jail for the rest of his life. Either way, firing him is a reasonable consequence for being odious.

          • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
            2·
            10 days ago

            “oh, maybe that person was just a random deviant and isn’t connected to the rest of the chat.” Then why didn’t anyone call him out? Why wasn’t he banned?

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.worldEnglish
          21·
          10 days ago

          Even in the incredibly unlikely scenario that was written by a child, why is this grown man participating in the conversation?

          Come on, have some common sense. It’s quite obvious what’s happening here. This is also not the only relevant piece of the transcript.