No, the sky isn’t falling, but Q Day is coming, and it won’t be as expensive as thought.

  • Rando@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Doesn’t quantum proof encryption exist already? I thought I learned that in college more than a decade ago… The only reason its not viable yet is because hardware was not powerful enough to run it without being slow.

    I could be misremembering though its been a long time

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      It does and many security or privacy oriented services have already implemented post quantum encryption, but majority of the internet still relies on AES-256 or similar if not worse.

      • Rossphorus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        AES-256 is fine actually. The best known quantum attack reduces key strength from 256 bits to 254.4 bits. The problem is that in order to use AES (which is a symmetric encryption scheme) you need to exchange keys using an asymmetric system like RSA, which is known to be weak to quantum attacks.