• bizarroland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 hours ago

    You have completely missed the point of my entire rant.

    Cico works, but “o” is a variable that can vary wildly from person to person, day to day based on environmental, genetic, and nutritional factors.

      • FarceOfWill@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The only way to find it is to eat less and less until you lose weight tbh. Cico is vacuously true.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Cico is vacuously true.

          https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/vacuously

          Showing a lack of thought or intelligence; vacant.

          Surprisingly, I agree with you! CICO is lacking in thought and intelligence when applied to human metabolism.

          The second law of thermodynamics requires a closed system, humans are famously open what with their breathing, eating, pooping, and peeing.

          CICO is like saying cars without fuel don’t move, so if overfill the tank you should park your car. It misses the point, and that is the hormonal drivers in human fat mobilization.

          Sugar/Carbs drive blood glucose, which drives blood insulin, which shuts down fat mobilization. Yes, you can lose weight eating only sugar, but it’s making the entire process more difficult then it needs to be. For more details please see The Carbohydrate-Insulin Model of Obesity - Beyond “Calories In, Calories Out” - 2018

          • Viceversa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I absolutely agree that cico could be very difficult psychologically and could demand health monitoring.