chigga@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 24 hours agoCHAT CONTROL REJECTED AGAIN BY PARLIAMENTlemmy.mlimagemessage-square65linkfedilinkarrow-up1967arrow-down14
arrow-up1963arrow-down1imageCHAT CONTROL REJECTED AGAIN BY PARLIAMENTlemmy.mlchigga@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 24 hours agomessage-square65linkfedilink
minus-squarelb_o@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up46·14 hours agoBY ONE FUCKING VOTE! https://howtheyvote.eu/votes/189574 Vote out every single fucker who is trying to limit our freedoms!
minus-squareazuth@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 hours agoEven worse I think there was one more vote for the extension but they need 50% +1 to pass and there were 24 abstentions.
minus-square1984@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up8·6 hours agoThats actually insane in itself that it got that close. Next time they will succeed. :/ People are so stupid to support this. They dont seem to understand that its never about protecting anyone and its always about building dystopia.
minus-squarechigga@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 hours agoi don’t understand, was EPP for or against the extension ? Cause my understanding was that they asked to have a second vote even if the first one already rejected the extension.
minus-square𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoIIRC (but could be wrong) the EPP wanted stricter chat controls, not an extension of what was already there.
BY ONE FUCKING VOTE!
https://howtheyvote.eu/votes/189574
Vote out every single fucker who is trying to limit our freedoms!
Even worse I think there was one more vote for the extension but they need 50% +1 to pass and there were 24 abstentions.
Thats actually insane in itself that it got that close. Next time they will succeed. :/
People are so stupid to support this. They dont seem to understand that its never about protecting anyone and its always about building dystopia.
i don’t understand, was EPP for or against the extension ? Cause my understanding was that they asked to have a second vote even if the first one already rejected the extension.
IIRC (but could be wrong) the EPP wanted stricter chat controls, not an extension of what was already there.