No, not really. It’s because they retracted the proposal before going to vote, because they knew it wouldnt pass after Germany publicly said they would vote against.
Then they changed some stuff and send it again, which is now rejected as it seems.
Yes, I think we’re all assuming the law came into parliament the regular way. I assumed the “they” are supposed lobbyists who are standing behind and outside the regular entity…
Am I missing something or are you pulling a Nielsen on me?
“Coffee?”
“Yes, I know.”
Why was chat control allowed to be presented again in the first place.
this is the real thing, this is almost certainly unconstitutional.
greedy corps going against law as usual.
No, not really. It’s because they retracted the proposal before going to vote, because they knew it wouldnt pass after Germany publicly said they would vote against.
Then they changed some stuff and send it again, which is now rejected as it seems.
Now they need to wait, but they didnt before.
So this war is far from an end huh?
We have to win every time. They only need to win once.
They won’t stop pushing until they get it
April 3, already planned
Who are they?
The Commission probably since they’re the only entity who can propose law
How do I respond to this^^
Yes, I think we’re all assuming the law came into parliament the regular way. I assumed the “they” are supposed lobbyists who are standing behind and outside the regular entity…
Am I missing something or are you pulling a Nielsen on me? “Coffee?” “Yes, I know.”
Oh, sorry. Thought you actually didn’t knew, my bad!