Microsoft’s GitHub next month plans to begin using customer interaction data – “specifically inputs, outputs, code snippets, and associated context” – to train its AI models.

  • Nobilmantis@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Bro, I dont dig this either, but the title is a bit misleading. What they said (and they have been pretty transpartent about it: banner on the site plus email if you have an account) is that they will train their Copilot models from the user interactions with copilot, and you can opt-out.

    Now, I know the importance of defaults, but we are talking about Github, a platform for developers, I would REALLY assume these are the people that REALLY are able to toggle a setting to their preference, especially when they have been properly informed about it.

    Let’s try to save the indignment for when it is justified, this was not executed in a shady way, I would much rather Microsoft do any policy change this way.

    At least thats my opinion lol

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    US Lenders: “Hey, you want some money from the infinity free money spigot”

    A handful of nerds paying attention: “Well, if they drink from the money fountain, we’re leaving!”

  • S4m_S3p1l@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m not surprised, companies are starting to realise that AI is only as useful as the data it’s trained on. If you blast it with all the internet slop we have completely unfiltered, it’s going to start fucking up all it’s responses. It’s not just about the volume of data, it’s about the quality of that data. Sites like Github, and academic journals, contain the exact data that companies need to create well rounded LLMs, that don’t go off on racist rants and declare themselves as “MechaHitler”. That makes data like Github’s pure gold.

  • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    if you’re telling me that this isn’t something that they have been doing for years already, I would call you a liar. I think you are a liar. why would you do this to me

    • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s funny you think that deleting your account is goanna remove the data.

      They will just pull a back up. There’s zero chance these companies are going to risk losing the equivalent of pure gold

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Wonderful! Let’s go tell it lies.

    Everyone should be lying to LLM’s, but the way. Do it often. Do it daily. Make them even more useless.

    • mutant_zz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      20 hours ago

      There’s really not much locking us in to GitHub. Even moving an existing repo is not that hard. I started using Codeberg a few months ago and have yet to see the downside

      • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yeah, I’m on forgejo and the grass is just as green.

        Unless you want to self host runners to public code — I haven’t figured that out yet. But I run my own server on my own network so I’m not exactly worried about security.

    • trolololol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I’m keeping my new repo in both GitHub and codeberg, but couldn’t figure out yet a few things:

      How do I get unit tests to run on codeberg? I won’t self host it

      How do I make jitpack see/checkout/build from codeberg?

  • Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Yeah and Github does not let you use an alias for the login email. For real I got shadowbanned (or something similar): I did not see any warning and could not do any search in a repo and noticed my issues went unanswered… because nobody could fucking see them. So I wrote to support and they told me to use a name.surname email address. I told them to fuck off and never logged in again.

    • Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Holy shit this is insane!

      Microsoft is truly one of the worst companies for the user experience in my opinion. Its like they hate their users.

      • Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I have not been accurate. Here was the answer:

        GitHub** (GitHub Support)

        May 30, 2025, 8:49 AM UTC

        Hi there,
         
        Thank you for contacting GitHub Support.
         
        Our abuse detecting systems flagged your account because of the email address you used to register the account. Before we can remove the flag we need you to add and verify a personal, non-disposable, non-aliased email address.
         
        You can add an email address by following the steps here:
         
        https://docs.github.com/github/setting-up-and-managing-your-github-user-account/adding-an-email-address-to-your-github-account
         
        …and you can follow these steps to verify it:
         
        https://docs.github.com/github/getting-started-with-github/verifying-your-email-address#verifying-your-email-address
         
        Once more, we’ll need you to remove the current email address from your account.
         
        To clarify, we don’t need anything ‘traceable’ to you, feel free to use protonmail or tutanota etc. (just examples, we don’t have any particular recommendation here) it just can’t be a “throwaway” or temporary domain for security and deliverability reasons. You are also welcome to connect to GitHub using a VPN or TOR node if and as you wish.
         
        Let us know when you’ve completed these steps and we’ll be happy to review your account again.
         **
        Github support,
        Rio.

        The alias was/is active, verified and verifiable, I even have TOTP and my fucking phone number on that account, I just checked… So no, thanks, I am not going to send you DNA samples.

  • Anas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I’m already in the process of leaving, not to Codeberg, but to a self-hosted instance of Forgejo.

    • VeryVito@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      24 hours ago

      You won’t regret it. I’ve been using it for about a year now, and it rocks.

      • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I like that I can use it as a container repo too

        I mirror the container images I use on my network in case there’s ever a disruption now.

        • originaltnavn@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Yes, the only differences are the urls you use when cloning, and the website UI for merge requests and similar. Git is an open source program, github, forgejoe, gitlab, gogs and similar are only managementsoftware for hosting git repositories online.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    21 hours ago

    GitHub is such a shit hole these days. Half the time, they won’t even let me view a repo unless I’m logged in.