The UN decided on the partition, the Arab League went to war against the refugees to remove them.
Anyway that was a long time ago, what matters is the children of those refugees were born in that land. Do you also not agree with birthright citizenship?
The Un gave a proposition it was not binding. Israel ethnically cleansed Palestinians to build the state. Yes the past is the past but today Israel is colonizing the west bank which everybody expect Israel acknowledge it as Palestinian . Those synagogues was hosting events where Americans can buy Palestinians land where the Palestinians living there was either expulsed illegally or killed. The UN still consider Gaza occupied and the west bank colonizer
You’re conveniently ignoring the fact that the Arab League ethnically cleansed Jews from their territory. Creating even more refugees that had nowhere else to go other than Israel.
The UN has made themselves largely irrelevant in all of this. And for shame, it would’ve been very useful to have the UN in the role of mediator and potentially be able to provide peacekeepers as they did in the past. But they’ve taken sides against a country for political reasons. They chose politics over diplomacy and failed at their primary mission.
After Israel did the nekba and ethnically cleansed 750 000 Palestinians and unlike you scum I do not agree with neither and nothing justify Israel continuing building colonies and expulse more Palestinians. Also some was not even expulsed.Some arab jews was transferer by deals between Zionists and Arab leaders (The Faisal–Weizmann Agreement, King Abdullah I of Jordan and Golda Meir agreement) and other with Zionists false flag (1950–1951 Baghdad bombings)
The UN took the side of Zionists the proposal was ridiculous jews minorities getting 55% of the land and the arab majority . One of the main reason for the UN was the holocust yet you have the audacity to sneak some antisemitic accusation in your working
One proof that Palestinians had no issue with normal Jewish immigration is the Yemeni jews migration
From an israeli source :
In 1884 the first Yemenites settled in Silwan and for 45 years lived peacefully and on very good terms with their Arab neighbors. It seemed that the people of Silwan, which was known to be a poor village, found common ground with the poor Jewish Yemenites that lived among them.
Despite the attempt to depict the 1929 Arab Riot as a violent incident against the Jews in Silwan, it is clear that it was not the case. From a letter of gratitude that the Yemenite Jews sent to their Arab neighbors, we can learn about the devotion and benevolence that the Arabs have shown towards the Yemenites by undauntedly protecting them, and also about the amity and good neighborly relations that prevailed between the two communities.
Israel started it by colonizing palestine for 78 goddamn year
White supremacists claim refugees are colonizing majority white countries all the time. You’re no different from them.
Unlike scum like you. I do not support any colonial power
So… you think refugees are colonizers?
refugees live along the local people in the same state. They do not force a state on the local people by ethenically cleansing them from the land
The UN decided on the partition, the Arab League went to war against the refugees to remove them.
Anyway that was a long time ago, what matters is the children of those refugees were born in that land. Do you also not agree with birthright citizenship?
The Un gave a proposition it was not binding. Israel ethnically cleansed Palestinians to build the state. Yes the past is the past but today Israel is colonizing the west bank which everybody expect Israel acknowledge it as Palestinian . Those synagogues was hosting events where Americans can buy Palestinians land where the Palestinians living there was either expulsed illegally or killed. The UN still consider Gaza occupied and the west bank colonizer
You’re conveniently ignoring the fact that the Arab League ethnically cleansed Jews from their territory. Creating even more refugees that had nowhere else to go other than Israel.
The UN has made themselves largely irrelevant in all of this. And for shame, it would’ve been very useful to have the UN in the role of mediator and potentially be able to provide peacekeepers as they did in the past. But they’ve taken sides against a country for political reasons. They chose politics over diplomacy and failed at their primary mission.
After Israel did the nekba and ethnically cleansed 750 000 Palestinians and unlike you scum I do not agree with neither and nothing justify Israel continuing building colonies and expulse more Palestinians. Also some was not even expulsed.Some arab jews was transferer by deals between Zionists and Arab leaders (The Faisal–Weizmann Agreement, King Abdullah I of Jordan and Golda Meir agreement) and other with Zionists false flag (1950–1951 Baghdad bombings)
The UN took the side of Zionists the proposal was ridiculous jews minorities getting 55% of the land and the arab majority . One of the main reason for the UN was the holocust yet you have the audacity to sneak some antisemitic accusation in your working
One proof that Palestinians had no issue with normal Jewish immigration is the Yemeni jews migration
From an israeli source :
https://emekshaveh.org/en/yemenites/