I really hope they die soon, this is unbearable…

  • early_riser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    It’s already hard enough for self-hosters and small online communities to deal with spam from fleshbags, now we’re being swarmed by clankers. I have a little Mediawiki to document my deranged maladaptive daydreams worldbuilding and conlanging projects, and the only traffic besides me is likely AI crawlers.

    I hate this so much. It’s not enough that huge centralized platforms have the network effect on their side, they have to drown our quiet little corners of the web under a whelming flood of soulless automata.

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    CGNAT Carrier-Grade NAT
    DNS Domain Name Service/System
    Git Popular version control system, primarily for code
    HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol, the Web
    IP Internet Protocol
    NAT Network Address Translation
    nginx Popular HTTP server

    5 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 6 acronyms.

    [Thread #90 for this comm, first seen 13th Feb 2026, 17:41] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    I was blocking them but decided to shunt their traffic to Nepenthes instead. There’s usually 3-4 different bots thrashing around in there at any given time.

    If you have the resources, I highly recommend it.

  • e8CArkcAuLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    that’s the kind of shit we pollute our air and water for…and properly seal and drive home the fuckedness of our future and planet.

    i totally get you sending them to nepenthes though.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      This is not how things work on the modern web. Did you just wake up from a 20 year coma?

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        Whenever you’re browsing even a semi popular website these days there’s probably a 98% chance you’re hitting a cloudflare cached version of it. Have you been asleep the last 10 years?

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          For static sites, yes. To actually protect dynamic sites against AI crawlers, Cloudflare has to do much more than just caching.

          And besides that, Cloudflare is a huge single point of failure and highly privacy invasive.

          • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            Dynamic sites still get cached.

            Cloudflare definitely is a huge single point of failure, and it is a huge problem imo - but what can we do? Their product is so widely used because of how comprehensive, good, and necessary it is.