thehatfox@lemmy.world to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 3 days ago500,000 households cancel TV licence putting BBC future in jeopardyinews.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square59linkfedilinkarrow-up1107arrow-down14
arrow-up1103arrow-down1external-link500,000 households cancel TV licence putting BBC future in jeopardyinews.co.ukthehatfox@lemmy.world to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square59linkfedilink
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up15·2 days ago the number of adults still using its TV, radio and digital services remained at 94 per cent of the population It really seems like something that should be handled with a tax.
minus-squareSenal@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·2 days agoI’d be interested to see where that number comes from because im fully sceptical of their ability to determine that.
minus-squareBlaestEgnen@feddit.dklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoIt’s not that hard to find viewing/listening numbers and site visitors. You can frame it in a lot of ways, to balloon the number. Daily, weekly and monthly users would be interesting numbers to have. The above numbers might indicate 94% interacts with BBC at least once a year, we can’t know. As the quote isn’t specifying how they determined it
minus-squareSenal@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoyeah, It’s not the numbers specifically , it’d be the collection methodology used to obtain those numbers that’d be interesting.
minus-squarePaddzr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·2 days agoI don’t believe this. Based on my zero evidence view.
It really seems like something that should be handled with a tax.
I’d be interested to see where that number comes from because im fully sceptical of their ability to determine that.
It’s not that hard to find viewing/listening numbers and site visitors.
You can frame it in a lot of ways, to balloon the number. Daily, weekly and monthly users would be interesting numbers to have.
The above numbers might indicate 94% interacts with BBC at least once a year, we can’t know. As the quote isn’t specifying how they determined it
yeah, It’s not the numbers specifically , it’d be the collection methodology used to obtain those numbers that’d be interesting.
I don’t believe this. Based on my zero evidence view.