It seems like the professor is saying that because he imagined they could be terrorists, that constitutes some sort of antisemitism? Or is it that because he was not protected from the non-terrorists because they could have been terrorists, then that constitutes antisemitism?
That just sounds like the antisemitism is entirely in his head?
It seems like the professor is saying that because he imagined they could be terrorists, that constitutes some sort of antisemitism? Or is it that because he was not protected from the non-terrorists because they could have been terrorists, then that constitutes antisemitism?
That just sounds like the antisemitism is entirely in his head?
If he was terrorised it’s terrorism