Attached: 1 image
#ChatControl 1.0 HAS PASSED - despite a majority voting against it (314:276) 🚨
After the EU parliament has rejected it TWICE in the past, it has been pushed as an urgent procedure for a new plenary vote. The EU has simply continued to put the vote on the agenda to get the outcome they've wanted since the start.
This is not democratic‼️
📸 Roberta Metsola (EPP) who revived Chat Control 1.0 shaking hands with Mark Zuckerberg. Taken from EP_President posted May 27, 2026 on X.
Today I’m angry about chat control. I’ll have to see if I can fit in some time to be angry about looming threats to the concept of ownership on Saturday, because tomorrow (Friday) is my angry at sprawling economic inequality day and I’m usually not finished until around 11pm.
it is dragnet mass surveillance, something I detest as it makes everyone guilty by default
We have it here in Australia:
Law enforcement agencies are being provided with the web browsing histories of people under investigation using mandatory data retention powers, despite the federal government specifically excluding that practice in the legislation, the commonwealth ombudsman has warned.
finally something genuinely worth getting upset over, not fuggin playstation cd games
You can also be upset about looming threats to the very concept of ownership.
Today I’m angry about chat control. I’ll have to see if I can fit in some time to be angry about looming threats to the concept of ownership on Saturday, because tomorrow (Friday) is my angry at sprawling economic inequality day and I’m usually not finished until around 11pm.
Is it though? This law has been applied for the last 5 years. How did it change your life?
it is dragnet mass surveillance, something I detest as it makes everyone guilty by default
We have it here in Australia:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/07/web-browsing-histories-are-being-given-to-australian-police-under-data-retention-powers