CityPop@lemmy.today to World News@quokk.au · 2 days agoVatican declares Society of St. Pius X in schism, excommunicates bishops and invalidates sacramentsapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square13linkfedilinkarrow-up180arrow-down10
arrow-up180arrow-down1external-linkVatican declares Society of St. Pius X in schism, excommunicates bishops and invalidates sacramentsapnews.comCityPop@lemmy.today to World News@quokk.au · 2 days agomessage-square13linkfedilink
minus-squareDagwoodIII@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·2 days agoI love religious people. We are Conservative Catholics who hold completely to all the ancient traditions. But the ancient tradition of Papal infallibility is wrong.
minus-squarestoly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 day agoPeople get mad at me when I say that anyone who is Catholic and disagrees with the Pope is an idiot.
minus-squareSkullgrid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·13 hours agoYou must be talking to some real assholes
minus-squarestoly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·13 hours agoIt has happened on here too lol. People like to take exception with many things.
minus-squareMirshe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoTo be entirely fair, Papal infallibility was only really defined in 1870. Now, Papal supremacy (the idea that the Pope is the ruling agent over the entire Church, and that their decisions must be unhindered) is ancient.
minus-squareSkullgrid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 day ago I got your traditional conservatism right here. How does eternity in hell sound like for traditional?
minus-squareGlowstick@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 days agoFyi papal infallibility only applies to certain things the pope says
minus-squareDagwoodIII@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoKinda proving my point, don’t cha think?
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 days agoI’m true to my own interpretation of this religion.
I love religious people.
We are Conservative Catholics who hold completely to all the ancient traditions.
But the ancient tradition of Papal infallibility is wrong.
People get mad at me when I say that anyone who is Catholic and disagrees with the Pope is an idiot.
You must be talking to some real assholes
It has happened on here too lol. People like to take exception with many things.
To be entirely fair, Papal infallibility was only really defined in 1870.
Now, Papal supremacy (the idea that the Pope is the ruling agent over the entire Church, and that their decisions must be unhindered) is ancient.
Fyi papal infallibility only applies to certain things the pope says
Kinda proving my point, don’t cha think?
I’m true to my own interpretation of this religion.