• Glowstick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    Absolutely, nuclear plants already in existence should keep operating but building new nuclear now is dumb. Renewables + storage is by far the best choice on every front - economically, speed of deployment, environmentally, up front costs, lifetime costs, cost per watt produced, long term easiness, short term easiness, politically, etc. etc. etc.

    • Yliaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Nuclear energy can be renewable. France used to operate nuclear w 98% of nuclear waste being recycled. Astrix, I believe, was the name before it was shut down. It just didn’t spread in concept.

      • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Recycling nuclear waste is simply not economically viable, which is the reason that only countries with nukes recycle their nuclear waste. And that still doesn’t solve the problem of less radioactive waste that still need to be stored for thousands of years and can’t be upcycled.

        • Yliaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          You say that, but even amongst countries w nukes, only France really ever recycled their nuclear waste. So I don’t think that’s the distinguishing factor.

          I don’t think the remaining 2% of radioactive waste is a significant concern.