Veserr@sh.itjust.works to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 28 days agoJudge throws out Andrew Tate’s legal claim to be told names of accuserswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square10linkfedilinkarrow-up1185arrow-down11
arrow-up1184arrow-down1external-linkJudge throws out Andrew Tate’s legal claim to be told names of accuserswww.theguardian.comVeserr@sh.itjust.works to United Kingdom@feddit.ukEnglish · 28 days agomessage-square10linkfedilink
minus-squareTenebris Nox@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·28 days agoWhy do they say they want the women’s names? It’s not made clear in the article.
minus-squareColdcell@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·28 days agoMy guess is it won’t be an apology.
minus-squareMalyca@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·27 days agoTo dox and intimidate them into dropping their accusations
minus-squareTenebris Nox@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·27 days agoI understand that. I just wonder how they are explaining this to the courts. I doubt it’s “We want to know who grassed us so we can make sure snitches get stitches, m’lud!”
Why do they say they want the women’s names? It’s not made clear in the article.
My guess is it won’t be an apology.
To dox and intimidate them into dropping their accusations
I understand that. I just wonder how they are explaining this to the courts. I doubt it’s “We want to know who grassed us so we can make sure snitches get stitches, m’lud!”