• teft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 days ago

    GIMP doesn’t do this.

    Stop supporting these shitty corporations and you won’t be constantly fucked over by them. Any corporation can end up with a board or executive that is a prude or overly religious or a fascist dickhead. So just don’t support them if you can help it.

    • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I would say Krita and blender are industry competitive but gimp has lagged behind. It’s usable but clearly not on a professional level yet. That said, if enough people started donating a fraction of what they pay to use Photoshop that this would change very rapidly.

      • MrQuallzin@pie.eyeofthestorm.place
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’ve attempted to use Gimp multiple times over the years and it never clicked. Tried Krita for the first time a couple months ago and it’s pretty nice

        • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yeah gimp has always been on like this cusp of being really good. I’m not sure if it needs to be forked or a full rewrite or just more funding. I know the biggest complaint has been the transition although that’s a tough egg to crack. It shouldn’t be a Photoshop clone but also not so dissimilar from industry norms.

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    The image adobe is getting mad about, is of her in a bikini, sitting on a paddle board. It’s not even over sexualized, it’s just a woman wearing a swimsuit. what the fuck.

  • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    If enough people started donating to FOSS like GIMP like a quarter or an eighth of what they pay for these E-corps I’m sure we could have industry competitive software that’s free and open source. Adobe has made their bed, they are ditching artists, essentially forcing them to give up their content to train their AI to change their business model to B2B. Now’s the time to revolt and have the community build their own tools for themselves.

  • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Is this an over correction for using ai to make child porn? Not to give Adobe too much credit, but that seems like the most likely answer for this.

    • dnick@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Right, just like anyone could stop using anything they found objectionable or immoral and keep their mouths shut about it, but this is exactly the type of thing not to keep your mouth shut about.

      Software that enable you to do something should at some point just do that. To get good at something, invest time and money into an ecosystem that takes a lot of both to invest in, shouldn’t arbitrarily use that as leverage against it’s users to impose it’s morals on them.

      Sure she could switch to gimp, and arguably she should literally because of things like this, but that’s not something you can easily do with everything, and it’s worth calling out when a corporation leverages a virtual monopoly on something to force it’s users to comply with something like it’s judgement of content.

      We’re lucky enough to have open source versions of a lot of things, but you don’t get anywhere simply voting with your wallet. Where you get somewhere is voting with a lot of people’s wallets.

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      They should but they should still make this video because its completely valid.