I recently saw this news on the technology community https://lemmy.world/post/44224445 and got very disappointed with the way things are going with this browser.

I started using it to do my part against the chromium monopoly, but Mozilla is making too many bad decisions in my opinion.

I’ve heard about forks like Librewolf and Waterfox.

Which alternatives would you recommend? Do you use any of them? What are your thoughts on them?

  • bizarroland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I like waterfox. I felt librewolf was a little too paranoid with its security permissions for convenient use and waterfox strikes a good balance in my opinion between what firefox is doing and what librewolf is doing.

  • angrywaffle@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    Guys, instead of a popularity contest, it’d be more productive if we listed the reasons for choosing one or another.

    • GreatWhiteBuffalo41@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I like that idea, it provides information and gives you something to research as well. IDK shit about shit though so I’m going to keep my mouth shut lol.

  • Anon764967@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I recommend Librewolf for logging in and using web apps, and Mullvad for one-time use. If security is your top priority, Trivalent is also a good option.

  • FoundFootFootage78@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    A browser fork is generally less secure, because they’re slower to get security updates. Firefox gives you the option to remove all the AI and that’s a better approach.

    Alternatively you could switch to Firefox ESR, which is basically just better in every way.

  • pigup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    23 hours ago

    A lot of people saying Fennec is good on Android. The line at the bottom is a bit of a turn off, isn’t it?

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Most Firefox forks still have support for Mozilla account sync and the extension malware blacklist, as those are useful features to have. But they do share info with Mozilla.

      • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Most Firefox forks still have support for Mozilla account sync and the extension malware blacklist, as those are useful features to have. But they do share info with Mozilla.

        I believe that Tor browser and Mullvad browser do not phone home to Mozilla. That’s my conclusion after using OpenSnitch for some time. Firefox and LibreWolf do phone home Mozilla at startup.

    • Sonalder@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Use IronFox (forked from DivestOS Mull Browser) if you want a private FOSS firefox-based browser on Android. Note that it still lacks per-site isolation like every other FF based browser on Android, but this seems to be the most harden option available.

  • Chaser@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    At the moment I just stick with firefox, as long as I can disable all the ai and telemetry bs. However in a few years Ladybird could be an alternative. They’re developing a whole new browser including the engine from scratch. Looks promising to me.

    https://ladybird.org/

    • imacatnotaman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It’s great. The only thing stopping my from using it full time is that no Firefox-based browsers work with the web office editor within my NextCloud instance.