• Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    That sucks, but how the fuck does Atlassian have 16,000 workers to begin with? What do they all do? And their products look like… Guestures at all of them

  • sleet01@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Their products are utter garbage to begin with, this can only hasten their well-deserved demise.

  • peacefulpixel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    “AI is too dumb to take our jobs” as if that matters. that’s not even the point, the point of Generative AI is to mine data and devalue human labour. according to the like 120 people who run this world too many people are making too much money so now we have a dogshit “technology” made to cut your wages whenever it’s convenient.

  • BioDriver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s not because of their garbage AI. It’s because their garbage AI is leading to people dropping them like a bad habit for open source and fucking Microsoft alternatives, so they need to reduce operating costs and CAPEX to demonstrate profit growth

  • patruelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yet everyone helps feed this AI beast. No one thinks… Maybe I’m helping this through my data.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      this post helps to feed the AI beast

      there’s no escaping it; let’s not do with AI what we’ve done with CO2 and plastic and shift blame to individuals

      • patruelis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I agree. However we are feeding it not through the data, but through $, subscriptions and data minng.

        We have a choice to renounce the subscription to meta, OpenAi, yet we dont.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m amazed they had 1600 employees to begin with. I guess it takes a lot of resources to make something suck as hard as JIRA

    • aquovie@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      At least 100 of those employees implemented the feature to autocorrect JIRA to Jira, just to be haughty insufferable ass.

    • qevlarr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Who else is going to put the sidebar as top bar, and then switch them back a couple years later?

  • andallthat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    AI-washing layoffs. They will replace jack shit with AI but that’s a better story than “we have to reduce costs because we don’t have cheap ways to refinance our $1B debt”.

    Credit isn’t cheap and Iran is not going to make it cheaper, investments in software have tanked, so the only story that can still be told with an almost straight face is that they still have big growth opportunities thanks to the magic of AI.

  • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Of all the shitty AI products flooding the market right now, Atlassian’s Rovo has got to be the most useless I’ve had the misfortune of using.

    They should be hiring more workers to fix their AI slop, not replacing them with even more of it.

    • Phunter@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      My employer has been axing so many high level engineers it’s not even funny. I think that’s terrible for engineer morale. Why would you want to strive to improve and get promoted if it just makes you “too expensive to keep on payroll”?