• schmorp@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    “monitoring people coming into Europe” <—> [username]@anarchist.nexus

    National borders yes or no?

    • Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      My apologies for not being one of those “bleeding hearts” that cares about everyone, i’m in Europe and i care about MY family here, it’s your responsibility to care about YOUR family wherever you are.

      I can feel sorry for those on the other side of the world but those that are affected in Brazil probably won’t care about us affected here because they are preoccupied with their own problems.

      Also National borders? What are you fucking stupid? If i cared about that i would have specified a country not a whole fucking continent.

      • schmorp@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        That’s a completely understandable short-term perspective of this problem. Paradoxically the only way to make sure that more people care is to care oneself, and that’s not always easy, especially when one has family.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Anarchy would naturally evolve into tribalism, which is even more effective at keeping outsiders away.

      • schmorp@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Who found out that this will happen? I wouldn’t mind to have smaller administrative units than the empires we’re dealing with now. Or, even better, we start understanding that we as a species share the rock we’re living on and that the borders we worship are made up lines. Shared rock = shared problems. We can only outsource problems for so long, and immigration is one of these outsourced problems coming back to bite the rich Western world in the arse.