• Serroda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    (Look inside). Wait, is this just an OnlyOffice fork? Why reinvent the wheel and not use OnlyOffice instead?

    • Crit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Control I’d imagine, if upstream ever does something they don’t want they can stop pulling the change downstream without having to migrate again to another tool internally, so easier to make that jump now ig

  • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I can’t wait for open source file standards to eclipse the proprietary microslopX formats. I hope adobe is being challenged with this for PDFs too.

    It was nice to have a single standard that everyone used until they started to really enshittify it. Will be real interesting to see how multinational companies handle file formats moving forward. If you do substantial business with europe then using these products is the only way to have true 1:1 compatibility, but if you do substantial business with the US the reverse is also true… except it costs nothing to load the europe open standard software, and it costs a fucking fortune to pay for microslop or heaven forbid try and leave their ecosystem. Google enterprise apps are no better. Everybody keeps trying to lock shit up so that nobody can compete.

    Another thing I hope they target is hypervisors / VMs. Vmware, ahv and Hyper-V are really the only options in enterprise today and almost everyone is still on vmware but quickly fleeing after the broadcom purchase and subsequent highway robbery. I want to see broadcom burn to the ground, but nutanix is just as bad with the attempted lock-in. I use proxmox but i’m not about to start using that for prod use cases at work- but if the EU wants to pick it up and transform it into something a bit more enterprise grade i’d be thrilled - or some other free and open alternative.

    Also looking for a third choice for smartphones without google or apple tendrils in it that will be compatible, and this seems more possible than ever to come to fruition despite ongoing attempts by google to lock down their ecosystem.

    • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      PDFs have some standardised form in ISO32000. Most usable standards started life as a product which is both a good and bad thing.

    • hard_zero1@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      OnlyOffice and therefore EuroOffice does not support ODF natively. It can only be converted to Micrososft’s OOXML for viewing or editing: https://helpcenter.onlyoffice.com/docs/userguides/document_editor/supportedformats.aspx

      In the linked Nextcloud blogpost, the CEO of Nextcloud is quoted saying they would put full support of open standards like ODF “on top of the agenda” for the next release (after working on the desktop and mobile apps and integration features (maybe for this release)?).

    • codenamekino@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ll be the first to admit that it’s reductive, but I can’t help but think of this every time anyone brings up a single unified standard, no matter the technology.

      • magikmw@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        There is a standard, and Microsoft extended it with proprietary bullshit mostly to make it incompatible. They say they still use the same standard.

    • Railison@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Any word on whether it’ll actually write ODF, even if not as default? IIRC OnlyOffice doesn’t write ODF

      • _lilith@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        “For a truly sovereign solution, it is also important to fully support open standards such as ODF formats, and this will be on top of the agenda for the next release.””

      • K3LOE@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, looks like my Ubuntu copy of OnlyOffice only writes ODT or OTT, not ODF.

          • K3LOE@lemmy.radio
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            .ODF is listed as an extension for “formulae, mathematical equations” on that Wikipedia page.

            • muhyb@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              17 hours ago

              People tend to mix ODT with ODF so I jumped to a conclusion, sorry about that.

              OnlyOffice indeed doesn’t support .ODF because it doesn’t natively support any open document format and convert from MS formats to open formats (learned this today actually) and since MS Office doesn’t have a math format like LibreOffice it’s expected that OnlyOffice doesn’t support .ODF at all. It’s quite interesting. I didn’t know that LibreOffice and OnlyOffice are fundamentally different like this.

    • amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Have you heard about proxmox? They have an enterprise version too. I can’t imagine what VMware or hyperv may have that proxmox doesn’t also have…

      • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I have a cluster already. The “enterprise” repo is functionally the same as the free one.

        It’s ok. It works. The limitations and UX leave a lot to be desired.

        I really don’t like the storage aspect. I’m not using ceph or anything like a DAS or SAN so I’m sort of limited to having identical hardware and configs on all nodes. Migrating from one node to another that doesn’t have identical storage naming convention seems to be impossible, and that is very strange to me. I just want to pick a compute and a storage available defined for VMs and for it to simply move from one named storage to another.

        Really don’t like that there is no mechanism to live migrate LXC either, needs a reboot of the lxc. Totally fine for small scale home use cases but still very strange to not have the same behavior. A vm is a vm, storage is storage, take the snapshot and find a way to make it happen ffs.

        Maybe a bit of this is just because I’m using prosumer/smb grade gear and I don’t have identical nodes hardware wise, but overall it is very strange. Stuff like not allowing watcher node VMs for HA unless you have an even amount of nodes, but why not let me setup two+ watchers? If I’m removing a third node to replace it I would rather have the watcher on standby until I shut it down or put said node on maintenance mode (don’t think this exists for proxmox, but the concept helps trigger loads of automation and things like DRS.)

        VMware is so stupidly easy. I just want proxmox to be a bit different. VMware is totally dead to me, but it hasn’t had a ton of real changes or feature adds that I l would ever use in the past ten years. Hard for me to be so forgiving that proxmox has been around for so long and doesn’t live up to the VMware of ~2012 based on my remembrance anyway.

        • BlackVenom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Your storage issue sounds self inflicted.

          Are you using random HSAs in each node or what? Not sure how you can otherwise not have das or san…

        • pgo_lemmy@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          last thing missing in your post is a complaint for slow migration on a 1gbit link…

          you can complain as much as you want because proxmox is not vmware or you can embrace proxmox and make the effort to move/update/refresh your knowlwdge on to the new environment.

        • amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I am not sure what you are talking about. I have a an hpc cluster at work that I manage and I set it up with proxmox. 13 nodes with various VMs. If there is no pci passthrough on a VM I can live migrate it on any node without stopping it.i am not using LXC there so I don’t know if that can be done or not.

          I have used ceph but we still don’t have the proper infrastructure for it at the moment.

          • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I am not sure what you are talking about.

            i am not using LXC there so I don’t know if that can be done or not.

            Yeah, it’s an lxc thing man. Sounds like you exclusively work with KVMs so you wouldn’t have come across it at all. They’re containers that in the case of proxmox run using a bit of the host’s files. LXD, a competing open source virtualization product, can run and live migrate LXCs. Proxmox devs know about the limitation at least as early as 2017 and in theory it’s on some kind of extreme long running back-burner to enable LXC live migration.

            My other VMs can migrate, though the storage thing can be a pain if you have a dissimilar node in the pool, but that’s more of an engineering challenge. Proxmox does not hold your hand with practically anything and their manual pages offer scant advice in terms of best practice.

    • Lysergid@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      You need to give up you personal data and buy €199/year subscription first. Special offer for Burgerstan

  • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’d be more excited to play with it but just like I haven’t printed anything in years, I haven’t needed an office suite in years. I just don’t do any of that stuff any more.