- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
To help train AI models, Meta and other tech companies have downloaded and shared pirated books via BitTorrent from Anna’s Archive and other shadow libraries. In an ongoing lawsuit, Meta now argues that uploading pirated books to strangers via BitTorrent qualifies as fair use. The company also stresses that the data helped establish U.S. global leadership in AI.
You must log in or # to comment.
Uploading torrents qualifies as fair use? Excited to see where this goes. Lol
They don’t mean it’s fair for you. It’s fair for corporations which need the same rights and privileges as people but obviously can’t be held to account like people because shareholders might make less money.
Worth remembering that any group could make a company. They are work, but not particularly class locked.
so we just need an international “data processing” co-op
An Uber driver is also a corporation.
Nowhere, the Zuck has his hand up Trump’s ass.
I want copyright to go extinct. It has no place in a proper civilization.
OFC, it’s not pirating if they do it. 🙄
The company also stresses that the data helped establish U.S. global leadership in AI.
Which is good for what again?
And is leadership in golfing better?
the underlying justification is so sickening.
“Breaking the law is OK if it’s profitable”
there is no such thing as “rule of law”
Uh…because they are gonna cash out, and bro down? The US needs to cash out the most, ‘cuz they wanna bro down like the world has never seen before. I’m citing unnamed officials who are working closely with the coordination of resources for the planned event. It’s gunna be sick.
Will there be boofing with Squee?
And is leadership in golfing better?
No, Mark hates golf as far as I know. He’s a big fan of BJJ though.
They are saying that seeding is inherently part of torrenting, not that it’s fair use. I mean, at least they weren’t a leech.
My stance is fuck the copyright companies and fuck Meta for everything they do except in this case, because seedings a good thing and so is Anna’s archive.
Seeding is NOT needed for downloading.
To be fair, I did say inherently part of. It would have been rude of them not to seed.
Those bastards stole all our data! But hey, at least they seeded it. Would have been pretty darn rude, otherwise.
I’m not pro-copyright. I actually steal content, as in pirate it and then watch it. I don’t consider it stealing to train AI on it.
“Our” data implies we collectively own it, yet we don’t, copyright companies for the most part do.
How does Elsevier feel about that???
Let’s wait for a case law then.
