🤘

I don’t like that “knowing about AI” is linked with knowing about AI execs. They don’t know shit. They think smoking is cool again. There’s a senior dev somewhere who hasn’t seen sunlight this week, I want to hear what they have to say.

You mean like early access to his truth social posts? He’s been hawking versions of this for awhile.

How do they have the battery for this?

If I ask for name and badge number but don’t get it, then there’s no distinction between them and any other US citizen. People are being arrested for impersonating ICE. I will do what I must to protect my family and loved ones.

I don’t even run arch but I’d be thrilled to stumble upon a Linux store this size. I now realize how much I want a stuffed penguin!

The only “poll” that matters is in November

deleted by creator

I suppose “film” is still accurate. It’s still a movie, it’s just an animated movie no different from the “live action” remake of the Lion King.

But just ten minutes into his presentation, a collaborator interjected telling that “something seemed off to them.” As it turns out, the way the new algorithm handled the edges of the surveys was “wrong,” Sutter admitted.

“It wasn’t a typo, and it wasn’t a missing citation or a factor of two,” he wrote. “It was subtle, but it was very wrong, and everything downstream of it was also wrong, and I had shared the whole thing in a room full of people who trusted me.”

“It was very wrong” HOW?!?!

The article might as well have continued “It was so obviously wrong that to go into detail would waste our readers time as any reader of this publication is well aware of the kinds of things that go wrong with the edges of surveys.”

You don’t have to go full vegan or vegetarian. Reducing beef intake without giving it up is better than nothing. Even swapping to chicken or pork for a meal or two a week will impact your big picture water usage more than you’d think.

Let’s throw some tariffs on top too, just in case.