• FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I hope someone takes them to court over spying on people with AI cameras next. That must’ve already happened, right?

    • auzy1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      There’s no law however that protects against that though unless they record voice…

        • auzy1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          That’s incorrect in most states. Wiretapping laws generally would require that they’re part of the conversation

            • auzy1@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              That’s not true, at least not in Victoria and many other states I’m aware of. Again, I know because I used to install/configure cameras, including in carparks and even a large shopping center. It’s also why most cameras don’t even include a mic at all

              Feel free to show us the exception in the law.

              Furthermore, it wouldn’t make any sense as it would be the world’s most obvious loophole and violate people’s privacy. As literally everyone could just claim they were trying to identify theft. And, it would still allow people to listen to the conversation if they were watching the nvr without being a part of the convo

              In some states, you need to be a part of the conversation. In others, you need permission from the other side too.

              This isn’t just Australia, world-wide in most countries a sign doesn’t count for consent

              There’s a reason you never see security footage on TV with audio recorded. You can possibly record a crime being performed as evidence, but, supermarket cameras would be recording all audio, including unrelated audio …

              • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                It depends on the purpose and the use. Recording audio on the prevention cameras is allowed, as long as it’s not being used specifically for spying on private conversations. Ie employees can’t just watch it to listen to what people are saying.

    • rcbrk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I remember seeing a video of their system behind the scenes, maybe in an attempt to reassure us we’re not being facial recognitioned or something – it showed height dots walking around the store.

      Hmm, so it’s actually far worse… I suppose that means gait analysis, too (≈mood/tiredness?). Combined with where you go in the store, how you pause at each display, what time of day/week, then finally correlating it with your card details and direct in your face camera at the checkout.

      It’s an incredibly detailed picture of who someone is.

      What a lovely relationship they have with Palantir and Microsoft. I love being a participant in the genocide machine every time I feed myself. (I’m assuming Coles is still in bed with them).